Today @ulliecker.bsky.social@lewan.bsky.social@lseimpactblog.bsky.socialblogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsoci...
The concept of misinformation has recently been subject to a range of theoretical and methodological critiques. Sander van der Linden, Ullrich Ecker and Stephan Lewandowsky argue misinformation has…
Out today: Don’t believe them! Reducing misinformation influence through source discreditation rdcu.be/dRYbb
Misinformation remains a threat to democracy. nature.com/articles/d41...@lewan.bsky.social@naomioreskes.bsky.social@profsanderlinden.bsky.social
In today’s polarized political climate, researchers who combat mistruths have come under attack and been labelled as unelected arbiters of truth. But the fight against misinformation is valid, warrant...
Preprint was posted in 2022, yes, it spent quite a bit of time in peer review and revisions.
Our review paper “Toolbox of individual-level interventions against online misinformation” is out today in Nature Human Behaviour! Truly a team effort by an international group of experts, led by the amazing Anastasia Kozyreva. www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Kozyreva et al. review evidence from individual-level interventions for fighting online misinformation featured in 81 scientific papers. They classify the interventions in nine different types and sum...
I am advertising a postdoc position to work on a cognitive psych project on misinformation 👇 Please share! external.jobs.uwa.edu.au/cw/en/job/51...
Agree again! :) See osf.io/preprints/ps...
Everyone in academia should be paying attention to this and thinking about how they/we can fight back against these bad faith attacks. As a scholar in an adjacent field targeted by some of these same bad actors, the "if you don't fight back, they'll go away" strategy is just not an option.