BLUE
Profile banner
WR
Wilson Ricks
@wilsonar.bsky.social
PhD candidate working in Macro-Energy Systems modeling at Princeton University. Energy tech/policy evaluation, with a primary focus on next-gen geothermal.
141 followers57 following10 posts
WRwilsonar.bsky.social

We talk abstractly about 'clean firm power' as a resource class in our toolbox, but there is a frighteningly small pool of techs with the potential to actually deliver it at scale before 2050: next-gen geothermal, advanced nuclear, and (with methane leakage mitigation) Allam-cycle gas

2

Doesn’t hydro do this? As I understand opening floodgates to power generation is very fast. Or by scalable do you mean expandable? Pretty sure we’ve tapped out most of the hydro potential in the US at least.

1
WRwilsonar.bsky.social

The success of just a few pilot projects happening now - Fervo's Cape Station, the nuclear demos by TerraPower and XEnergy, and NETPower's Project Permian - will determine whether clean firm power is actually part of our toolbox in the 2030s and beyond. If not, the problem becomes much harder.

0
Profile banner
WR
Wilson Ricks
@wilsonar.bsky.social
PhD candidate working in Macro-Energy Systems modeling at Princeton University. Energy tech/policy evaluation, with a primary focus on next-gen geothermal.
141 followers57 following10 posts