Oh this is from the Washington Post's Editorial Board itself. That is… definitely something.
This article is barely two paragraphs long and doesn’t even mention what he said last night. It feels like they’re just tossing their readers a bone in response to complaints about not holding him accountable—and they failed at even that. It’s clear they couldn’t be bothered to show any real effort.
I think readers should demand to know why this hasn’t been reported until NOW: Last month in Wisconsin: “They will walk into your kitchen,” Mr. Trump said of undocumented immigrants. “They’ll cut your throat.” Later, he called the same people “animals.” They literally put “last month.”
So far the @washingtonpost.com is the only outlet to clearly state that Trump's "bad genes" comments are him out-and-out embracing eugenics; not "flirting with," not a "long-held fascination with genes and genetics." Eugenics. So good on the Washington Post. Everybody else, get your shit together.
Damn. Sometimes gonna get for finally having some professional ethics
Odd how the dems get endorsements from all the evil Bush admins and a week later suddenly its ok to admit Trump is a literal Nazi. Like if Kamala even mentioned a ceasefire or public option off hand this article would be another 1 titled "In Fiery Speeches Trump Gives Voice To Right Wing Grievances"
Did they just now discover how he plans to destroy the Fed and return to the gold standard? Because I could imagine WaPo turning on him when they finally get around to reading Project 2025 regarding finance