BLUE
Profile banner
YK
Yudhishthir Kandel
@yudhi.bsky.social
Jack of many things: Modeling, Engineering, Physics, Mathematics, Statistics, Software Dev. Student of: Economics, Business, History, Politics, Sociology, Anthropology, Philosophy, Law, Art, ... I like to make sense of fuzzy quantification
18 followers65 following72 posts
YKyudhi.bsky.social

It definitely isn't. Irrational number ratios are impossible to manufacture.

2

JMjmnetwork.uk

You're just being contrarian. Obviously it is an approximation. Most figures are impossible to manufacture. There will always be tolerances. Let's say you produce two planks of wood, 2m and root 2m. Both are (+-0.1%) from their desired value. You wouldn't say the 2m plank wasn't 2m.

0
MFtheorecol.bsky.social

By what logic? Because I'd guess by the same logic, rational number ratios are also impossible to manufacture. Yet here I am, surrounded by parallel-ish edges. Measurement ≠ true length.

1
Profile banner
YK
Yudhishthir Kandel
@yudhi.bsky.social
Jack of many things: Modeling, Engineering, Physics, Mathematics, Statistics, Software Dev. Student of: Economics, Business, History, Politics, Sociology, Anthropology, Philosophy, Law, Art, ... I like to make sense of fuzzy quantification
18 followers65 following72 posts