And what was she doing on those days
"public events" in that tracker meaning only in person events where they deliver their stump speech. This is where the goalposts are now? Trump going to some random spot in Queens is better campaigning than Harris going on 60 Minutes?
Are you also known as the "eat you in the revolution" guy on twitter? Cause that seems kinda rough.
Keep those contrarian takes coming and maybe you too can reach Stancil Level.
Since the debt is in fact recovered in average years, this is yet another reason you can shut up about "bad debt." But more fundamentally, the "unrecovered" money from subsidized/forgiven student loans benefits society in the same way grants do. It's not really "debt" and it is quite good.
It doesnāt make the debt badāeducation should be available to people who arenāt already rich. It makes the terms of that debt bad. Which is why itās better for the feds to service directly rather than pay private banks,and to forgive as much of it as possible. Good talk.
One of the many things you don't understand about student loans is you can never truly default until you're dead. They garnish your wages and take your social security.
For the FFEL program that was eliminated, the government covered all the debt while paying the bankers a fat salary. And the top interest rate prior to 2006 was 8.25%, with no PSLF. It wasn't "bad debt"āit was welfare for investment bankers.
Prior to the pandemic interest pause, student loans were breaking even, and making a tidy profit on interest for graduate loans. thecollegeinvestor.com/39673/does-t...
Depending on who you ask, the government either earned a profit or lost money on federal student loans. Here's how it works.
Nice citation of an AEI goon. The government recovers 104% of loans. They *do* make a profit on higher interest loansāas your 8 year old article points outābut they subsidize undergrad education. Which is the point. It's not "bad debt" anymore than SSI and highway funds are.