There is also the very real possibility that public pushback may well (not in the next year, and not if Trump wins) force Labour MPs to revolt against leadership around the time of the next by-elections in order to keep their jobs, replacing Starmerism with something softer
I'm not too worried, just seemed unusual to delete your whole account like that over some pushback that wasn't rude (IMO).
📺Bret Baier isn’t a real journalist. And Kamala Harris came prepared for the hackery. Excellent pushback here. www.threads.net/@kaivanshrof...
Oh good I’m glad there’s pushback. Will read and likely sign later
Yeah, that’s fair. I think generally we’d all love to see a lot more pushback on the anti-trans and anti-immigration rhetoric from Harris but she’s been on her “win over Nikki Haley voters” crusade which we can only hope is not a totally boneheaded strat.
A -feather’s- touch of pushback and he folds like a deck chair. Truly, the champion of the people.
This alone should basically sink him. It won't, but when actually asked basic economic questions the man imploded. If the election is, even partially, about the economy, this would sink him. www.rollingstone.com/politics/pol...
Donald Trump was unable to give coherent answers on his economic plans in an interview with Bloomberg at the Economic Club of Chicago.
But it’s not just Trump. They never challenge anyone. Even if it’s a good question, there’s rarely any pushback to the lies.
This makes sense when you look at it through the right wing concept of "free speech" meaning "I should be able to say what I like, and you should have to listen to it, and I should receive no pushback for what I said" (as well as the context of him not caring about blocking as a safety feature)
I don’t get it either, they’re ridiculous letting him blather on lying his ass off with no pushback, no confrontation, no follow up, no outrage, just subservient, scared note takers!