Wild how Cliffjumper's canonical main weapon is like an absurdly horrific warcrime of a weapon
VATNIK DAILY WARCRIME - HERE A POW ORC TELLS THE STORY OF THE TIME THAT HE, AND ANOTHER ORC MURDERED IN COLD BLOOD, THREE #UKRAINIAN INFANTRY THAT HAD SURRENDERED - THIS WAS CAPTURED ON FILM, AND USED AGAINST THEM IN EVIDENCE 🤬
This is good, dropping a cooked sprout into someone's workspace is a potential warcrime. I do think there's some association of a raw sprout being like a "for good luck" gesture, but I don't know where my head got that. Brussel sprouts and beets are in a dead heat for me for "worst vegetable."
Killing civilians isn't a warcrime. It sucks to say that, but it isn't. Insurgents not respecting uniform rules unfortunately means identifying bad guys is hard, mistakes get made. The incident in that video also wasn't a drone, that was a helicopter, all parties were present on the battlefield.
The same way strapping a gun to a remote-control plane makes the warcrime you just denied (journalists are noncombatants, dickhead) happen, that is to say, it is the tool by which it does. Warcrimes were always going to happen in Iraq, thanks to the Coalition generalship's incompetence.
About to boot up warcrime simulator again (Rimworld)
No shit sherlock, genius insight. Now how exactly does strapping a gun to a robot dog make more warcrimes happen? That video isn't even a warcrime, btw.
Shooting or bombing medics is usually a warcrime