The anomalies section on the wikipedia page is particularly impressive. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_in... I like the one island that just sort of... does that, who knows why.
the wikipedia article on baoulé is woefully short it only has a consonant and vowel chart and a table describing the (seemingly perfectly phonemic) orthography
From his Wikipedia entry: "Gullis described his classroom personality as "a mixture of Boris Johnson and Jacob Rees-Mogg", and said that he "liked to play the character of an English gent"" Ideal teaching persona, which might explain some of his short tenures at various schools.
An example Agora user journey. Here, with query [[tyrant]] while researching for current reading [[on tyranny]] I ended up reading about an interesting tyrannicide; thanks go to Wikipedia as usual :)
Luckily for me when i googled it I got sent to wikipedia and very quickly lost interest in it when the equations showed up
Sometimes you find the unexpected when visiting the Wikipedia page of journeymen TV and film composers (in this case, Dominic Frontiere).
They really shouldn't have worried. Some time in the night, the poor lizard managed to escape -- though he probably spent the next few weeks picking glitter out of his scales.
What's going to happen to Wikipedia when people realize that they can just tell an AI "The 2024 election was stolen," plug it into a botnet, and watch it make thousands of small, logical, internally consistent edits to support that statement? How could we ever unravel that?