It’s an editorially safer space. TBD if the know nothings get reincarnated

Thank you for your kind endorsement. Just to be clear, while Byline Times and the Bylines Network are linked (sharing directors), they are financially and editorially separate. BT is pro (paid) journalism with a monthly newspaper, while BN is (volunteer-based) citizen journalism.

Now, you can of course question of *why* so many major papers refuse to exhibit any object permanence! One might fairly note that they're capable of it in certain cases, such as, say, an editorially-driven focus on fitness of one particular candidate, or The Many Questions About Trans Kids

I think it's hard to find the balance between being a technical supplement that can be implanted in the game, and a "lore" supplement that's mainly there to inspire and bring about GM/player creativity. Editorially it's a difficult line to walk, especially if you're trying to achieve both.

I can see the possibility for better tools to do some of these tasks that aren't really "AI". Example: MS has its own tech style guide - a tool that checked docs up against it would be more editorially useful than Copilot, but it wouldn't be "AI" ... maybe slap the adjective on it anyway? Would buy.

In sincere agreement with most replies so far. There was a quantitative and qualitative difference between how Trump and Biden's age was covered editorially. If this story leads to daily stories until the election across multiple outlets, then yes on both. Otherwise, no.

It's really silly. Can see how it happened - ITV think they're quoting in the headline someone in the story who used the word "tragedies". But to anyone who hasn't read it, it looks like they are editorially distancing themselves from the idea this is intrinsically tragic.

She's also not courting print media (who tried in vain to neg her editorially to force her to do interviews) which honestly feels shrewd at this point

Editorially-speaking yes. I am intentional about not responding to all news/crashes/fatals, etc... outside of Portland because that keeps me busy enough and once I expand to other places, expectations get out of whack. Doing it for mental health also. I can only track and cover so many places well.

The NYT gets consistently pantsed like this because they are ill equipped to deal with bad faith actors. Editorially, it just doesn’t occur to the powers that be that a person could be acting disingenuously when interacting with them.