No longer enforceable due to the court ruling in that case Cruz argued, but yes it's still on the books. So is the sodomy law struck down in Lawrence.
Yep like, discovery had such a high cost. Trans men back then 1000000% would be incentivized to not leave any kind of record James Barry could of gotten out of a sodomy trial by exposing this fact, but he was willing to die on the hill that he is a man
Nada, absolutamente nada nem ninguém... Minha cabeça: It's a violent pornography Chokin' chicks and sodomy The kinda shit you get on your TV 🎶
they won't stop at porn: now they have all the surveillance tech in the world to impose 'Sodomy Laws' again, and that includes both 'butt-stuff' and oral (and NO jerking off because 'every sperm is sacred') No contraception means either 'productive sex' (how many kids CAN you support?) or NO SEX.
they won't stop at porn: now they have all the surveillance tech in the world to impose 'Sodomy Laws' again, and that includes both 'butt-stuff' and oral. (and NO jerking off because 'every sperm is sacred') No contraception means either 'productive sex' (how many kids CAN you support?) or NO SEX.
This is right around the time that the Florentine morality police gave up and admitted they couldn’t enforce the cities ban in sodomy because more than 50% of the cities make population was guilty so I bet they were having a good time.
A lot of people might remember Bowers v. Hardwick (1986), in which the attorney general of Georgia prosecuted two gay men for "the act of consensual sodomy in a private setting." The Supreme Court ruled the law was constitutional, but overturned it in 2003 Lawrence V. Texas. But...
And, you know, “sodomy” or “daughters get dad drunk and seduce him” (Lot is a lot)
Anyway…It's a violent pornography, choking chicks and sodomy, the kind of shit you get on your TV!
