I think it is appropriate to decline. The editors who invite you should can see your refereeing status (the last date you agreed, reviews in progress), so it's on them to make sure that you are not overloaded with requests.
No worries, your question made me look up where it is from, so I learned something new
It's from "The Kingdom of God Is Within You" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Kin...
Envy. But also, congrats!
Congratulations!
I think so, which is why I was curious about what other people think. Strictly speaking, it does not seem like RCT implies anything about the conditions. But the important thing is how people perceive it
Ok, second best?
The best Christmas gift for a teacher
Good points
You do have randomization, but within subjects, and the point is not to measure the treatment effect but use this variation to say something about preferences. E.g., you can vary the lotteries a subject has to choose from, and you can still observe how that affects their choices (treatment effect)