I’m not going to bother reading something nobody bothered to write.

For a couple of years now, ESPN has been publishing machine generated "recaps" of college basketball games. They are horrid and embarrassing. Looking at the box score is more engaging. There is no earthly reason for this content to exist.

Well put!

AI generated reports is not the same as AI generated novels, news or stories. I am ok with the first one as long as it is sourced properly.

That’s okay. An AI assistant will read it for you and respond appropriately.

If we're using AI to generate a bunch of meaningless fluff to our writings then maybe we need to look at what we're writing.

Looks like I lifted this from something I read online. I would attribute it better if I knew where I got it from.

Can you get an AI to give you a summary?

Unfortunately, I think the only way you're going to discover something was written by AI is to read it. Anyone who uses AI to write isn't going to brag about that.

It’s great for technical writing and outlining, but should not be used independent of human guidance.

I'm going to read anything that helps me in whatever it is I'm doing.