Nouvel épisode de Répare ta science: On y parle des astuces peu recommandables pour survivre dans le milieu scientifique. podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/adr...
"the model yields the counter-intuitive prescription that punishing non-culpable members of the team for participating in a fraudulent project is the most promising tool for increasing the fraction of research that is honest." This study is worth a read : papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
In this presentation, I talk about our "next big thing" -- an effort to connect many innovative, community-led services evaluating research into a re-imagined approach to scholarly communication and publication. We will need your help to test whether it will work!
Watch this: "PCI webinar series - Brian Nosek - Reimagining scholarly publishing to promote credible research" www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0Lc... Not easy for open-science scholars to stay hopeful, but these initiatives boost me. Thanks @peercommunityin.bsky.social @briannosek.bsky.social & @cos.io
YouTube video by Peer Community In
Yes! This is literally how I begin my #Rstats#EconSky
📉📈 Economics is a Field of Software Engineering https://www.maximum-progress.com/p/economics-is-a-field-of-software "The vast majority of #economics papers published today are collections of text, code, and data. But very often only the text part of this package is reviewed and … 1/3
It should start acting like one
Psycho Papers #42 Aujourd'hui, on parle de : Une étude sur les biais de genre dans le recrutement, Des entreprises qui payent pour le greenwashing La meilleure échelle de mesure de la dépression ⬇️ psychopapers.kessel.media/posts/pst_c6...
Une étude qui met à mal les biais de recrutement - La majorité des grosses entreprises payent...
Submit papers for our Meta-Science Workshop in Berlin this November! Or just come & join to meet a keynote speaker who has been doing science of science decades before we gave it a fancy name: Harry Collins from Cardiff www.zbw.eu/de/ueber-uns...
“when a study is retracted, it should trigger a cascade reaction and, in some cases, a ‘cascade retraction’. This would mean that all the papers that cite that study should be reassessed, and if their conclusions hinged on now-retracted results, they should be corrected or retracted as appropriate”
Awareness of when a paper can’t be trusted is often too low — but adopting some easy-to-use technological solutions can help researchers, publishers and referees to clean things up. Awareness of when ...