I would say that is the majority of people. Many of us were never taught it is ok to disagree or how to, therefore it's easier to voice your opinion online than face to face.
I might need to add this list of books to my course page. I am always trying to walk that fine line between informing students of the scale of the problem but also scale of solutions and reasons for hope.
It's not all doom and gloom when it comes to climate change. Here's a list of books that can help inspire and expand your own feelings about the future.
Deep sea mining company says polymetallic nodules not making oxygen. In related news, fossil fuel company says COâ doesnât cause climate change.
Find would mean Earth has a completely new source of oxygen, but critics say evidence is weak
so have libraries, immigrants, state bureaucrats, judges, judicial aides, abortion providers, poll workers, elementary school children with gay teachers,
I'm feeling a little lost that my partner not only doesn't read books, he doesn't understand why I love them. I also don't read linear which mystifies him more. Most books I own hold information and ideas that I always go back to. www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archiv...
Identifying as someone who categorically rejects books suggests a much larger deficiency of character.
Hospitals are using it for transcribing and I have to opt out every time. I feel guilty because I feel like I am making their job harder, but I also want to bring awareness and make my opinion heard.
Across the United States, utilities are planning new gas-fired power generation at their fastest rate in years â in part to supply tech companies who are building out massive data centers driven by AI hype. Generative AI remains a climate disaster.
New gas plants just keep on coming, defying expectations that their rapid growth was nearing an end.
Actual: "Did not use any military equipment". Ugh.