Much as I would be amused for this to be true (and am not surprised it's a pre-write), if you look at the actual source it's quoted from you can see it occurs 2 *other* times on the page, one with a date in 2015. It looks to me like part of rendering some kind of collection, perhaps of old columns.
it's possible that this refers to the boilerplate at the end about Ross writing the Deep Places memoir
Guessing it was published then hidden
It’s in the fuckin URL
I mean… it could have been a base template that said nothing of consequence… maybe… but that might be giving them too much benefit of the doubt.
Wassup, @nytimes.com ? 🤷♂️
Absolutely done with giving Sulzberger and the NYT any benefit of the doubt Jesus Christ
You'd think by this point the times tech support would convince them to know better than to pull this shit.
