BLUE
Profile banner
FO
Friend of Jamis (Taylor's Version)
@bwsnorth.bsky.social
Anxiety a Superpower Banner via @swiftonsecurity.com
77 followers608 following374 posts
Reposted by Friend of Jamis (Taylor's Version)
TRkenwhite.bsky.social

/2 ā€¦and she answered questions with evident pride that her kids were adults, an engineer and an architect. Thatā€™s America.

12
Reposted by Friend of Jamis (Taylor's Version)
EZzitron.bsky.social
Reposted by Friend of Jamis (Taylor's Version)
BHbradheath.bsky.social

Someone took notes on the fake-electors conspiracy.

17
Reposted by Friend of Jamis (Taylor's Version)
GOdavekarpf.bsky.social

Blogged my debate reaction thread: The Trump-Vance campaign strategy is basically to gaslight the country. Vance couldn't *quite* pull it off. This format is about as good as JD Vance is ever going to look. And in the end, he just couldn't maintain the facade. open.substack.com/pub/davekarp...

JD Vance couldn't *quite* gaslight the audience for the full 90 minutes.
JD Vance couldn't *quite* gaslight the audience for the full 90 minutes.

The format favored Vance, but he couldn't make it the whole way without being creepy and weird.

2
Reposted by Friend of Jamis (Taylor's Version)
CGchrisgeidner.bsky.social

"Threat of censorship" is a bigger threat to democracy than anything that happened on January 6, Vance says. I guess that's his Thiel payback. "Jan. 6 was not Facebook ads," Walz says, calling it "revisionist history." Walz asks Vance if Trump lost in 2020; Vance won't say.

4
FObwsnorth.bsky.social
Reposted by Friend of Jamis (Taylor's Version)
MQmootquestion.bsky.social

Wellness check on Popehat, "can't yell fire in a crowded theatre"

0
Reposted by Friend of Jamis (Taylor's Version)
Eemptywheel.bsky.social

LOLOL. Remember how many of Trump's people (including Mark Meadows and Peter Navarro) used private comms to plan an insurrection? Smith is relying on that to make their immunity arguments.

This includes
material that goes to context and that the defendant incorrectly claims he does not already haveā€”
such as proof of the funding and organization of the Ellipse rally at which the defendant spoke on
January 6; evidence about the defendantā€™s actions surrounding meetings and communications that the Government contends are unofficial; and other information indicating private, rather than
official conduct, like Hatch Act warnings and use of private email accounts.
2
Reposted by Friend of Jamis (Taylor's Version)
Eemptywheel.bsky.social

Beginning to wonder whether Trump is grifting so hard bc he recognizes that his brand may be irredeemably harmed with his rubes if a Black woman beats him. Does the conman worry that, once that happens, he'll lose half his cult members?

18
Profile banner
FO
Friend of Jamis (Taylor's Version)
@bwsnorth.bsky.social
Anxiety a Superpower Banner via @swiftonsecurity.com
77 followers608 following374 posts