Just to be very clear, I'm appalled that authors' work - publicly funded, supported by universities and held in copyright by individuals - is continuing to be sold in this way. Thanks for clarifying the point on visibility.
I guess it's also to do with what's dominant in those datasets. So, if content out there online is often misogynist or racist, that gets reproduced. I can see that authoritative peer-reviewed material is what AI needs to be more reliable - but obviously this is not the ethical way to go about it.
This is so disheartening and enraging. All we can do is resist - but also engage and influence where we can...
Not long now before this #blackhistorymonth event. Everyone is very welcome - it’s all online. Find out more info & sign up using the link below 👇
There's still time to book your free place to join us at this #zine@ihr.bsky.social#RefugeeTales#refugeewww.history.ac.uk/events/refug...
I know! Alice was kind enough to share a sneak preview - the 'real thing' should be waiting on my door mat when I get home 😊