will always be hilarious to me that we all talk about ‘sexual fantasy’ as standard lexicon but the second someone includes fantastical elements in sexuality the reaction is OH MY GOD SO CRINGE DOES ANYONE ACTUALLY GET OFF TO THIS NO WAY HOW STUPID

haha yeah

It's extra hilarious when I think of the mountain ranges that could be built out of all the paranormal romance/urban fantasy that was being published a decade ago. A substantial amount was soft-core porn with just a touch more plot than your average 80s porn film. ESPECIALLY the shifter stuff.

The idea of being in a sexually AND emotionally fulfilling relationship with a partner who loves you for you is, unfortunately, a difficult fantasy to attain in real life…

I think it's that way with almost all sexual fantasies. Talking about them in the abstract is fine, but start using specifics and the ol' Puritan Shame kicks in.

Whoa chuck tingle is here Twitter is cooked now

There is an accepted subset of fantasies that are standard, I mean nobody is going to look like the photoshopped lady in the ad because real humans would die if their dimensions were like that. So tentacles, no, but waist smaller than spinal cord, yes.

my “sexual fantasy” creation process was favorably compared to yours the other day and it was the highest compliment of my life and the way you talk about this here reminded me of that cause i know that reaction well 💜

The people reacting have obviously never met a furry in their lives.

"Heck, given the modern standards of beauty, longing to have sex with a full-figured otter woman is only slightly less realistic than wanting to have sex with a supermodel. And the otter lady is probably more fun at the sushi bar." www.brunching.com/furries.html

*quickly tries to stuff my tentacles back in the closet* What?