Thanks for the clarification and context.

Perhaps we are talking about different types of interviews? I am thinking of conversations where faculty and students specifically discuss the conventions of writing in the discipline and what will be expected in the major -- not the faculty member's research.

I've taught 1st yr comp & faculty complain to me that students still "don't know how to write" (read: don't know how to write for MY field). I can't teach all disciplinary conventions so how else do you recommend I get students familiar with what their profs want before they are penalized for it?

Any ad that isn’t transparent about the hiring timeline and salary is of concern to me. It indicates there will likely be a lack of transparency in other things as well.

I also find it really egregious that universities essentially require students to opt in to allowing TurnItIn to a) profit from adding their work to their database and b) use their assignments to reinforce cop shit in classrooms.

I visit a lot of schools to facilitate faculty development, and the most asked-for topics (often requested by admin!) are fostering belonging, relationships, and trust w/ students. Yet many of them refuse to invest in those goals, and instead blow $$ on AI shit that actively works against them.

CONGRATULATIONS!