BLUE
Login
Profile banner
MM
mat marques, ph.d.
@fabiovelo.bsky.social
bicycles, coffee, and social psychology. he/him. woiworung land. mdmarques.com
84 followers105 following122 posts
OverviewPostsReplies
Reposted by mat marques, ph.d.
BNbrendannyhan.bsky.social

An authoritarian demagogue inspiring crowds to demand the expulsion of a group of nonwhite legal residents based on their nationality. Could not be more explicit what we're seeing here.

ARatrupar.bsky.social

Trump attacks (legal) Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio, prompting "send them back!" chants from his fans in Pennsylvania

32
Reposted by mat marques, ph.d.
MBmjbsp.bsky.social

Political social media ads labeled as from in-party sources and apparently non-partisan sources are trusted more than out-party sources. So if you want to be sneaky just advertise under a name without any party connections #SocialPsyc#poliskyonlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....

Paper title: Online political adverts: The effect of disclosures and opportunities for clandestine campaigning abstract: The use of digital technology has become an increasingly prominent feature of election campaigns. While many of those using online tools are familiar partisan actors, many others are not. As concerns about electoral transparency have grown, policy makers have moved to implement regulation designed to help citizens recognize the identity of campaigners. In this paper, we test the rationale behind such regulations by asking how disclosures on online adverts—both informal badging and formal imprints—affect evaluation by UK voters. Using experimental survey design, we test the reactions of participants to real Facebook adverts, labeled as originating from both partisan and apparently non-partisan sources. Across three experiments, we consistently find evidence to support concerns about what we term “clandestine campaigning”; a phenomenon whereby apparently non-partisan g
Example advert warning highlight a facebook ad is from the labour party.
Figure shoring people trust ads labeled as from an in-group or non-partisan, than from an outgroup.
0
MMfabiovelo.bsky.social

repost with a cool song that’s under two minutes Soundtrack of my final year of highschool. Would end up seeing them a few months later play O-Week at Uni. www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1BD...

0
Reposted by mat marques, ph.d.
BBmanjusrii.bsky.social

LinkedIn has decided to use your data to train its AI. You’ll notice it is turned on by default (we don’t have GDPR in Australia) Turn it off: Settings > Data Privacy > Data for Generative AI Improvement

2
Reposted by mat marques, ph.d.
CWcameronwilson.bsky.social

Australia's biggest radiology clinic I-MED has handed over private medical scans from potentially 100,000s of Australians to buzzy tech startup Harrison. ai to train their AI — and patients had no idea. Neither company responded to questions about it. www.crikey.com.au/20...

7
MMfabiovelo.bsky.social

bluesky now has over 10 million users, and I was #1,195,263! reasonably late to the party, but fun to be here.

0
Reposted by mat marques, ph.d.
ADdrdanvers.bsky.social

Important headline. www.wired.com/story/elon-m...

Elon Musk Is a National Security Risk
Elon Musk Is a National Security Risk

Musk’s now-deleted post questioning why no one has attempted to assassinate Joe Biden and Kamala Harris renews concerns over his work for the US government—and potential to inspire extremist violence.

0
Reposted by mat marques, ph.d.
PEpeter-ellis.mastodon.social.ap.brid.gy

I blogged with #rstatshttps://freerangestats.info/blog/2024/09/14/stepwise

5
MMfabiovelo.bsky.social

how would you describe it ?

1
Reposted by mat marques, ph.d.
MRmarkrubin.bsky.social

New cross-cultural study (N = 24,009; 42 countries) finds more support for social identity theory and social dominance theory than for system justification theory. By @evanavaldes.bsky.social@matthewmatix.bsky.socialwww.researchgate.net/publication/...#SocialPsyc#PolPsych 🧪

System Justification Theory (SJT) is a thriving field of research, wherein the primary questions revolve around why individuals and groups are motivated to see the systems they depend on as just, fair, and legitimate. This article seeks to answer how accurate the postulates of SJT are when compared to competing self-interest claims of Social Identity and Social Dominance Theory. We addressed the ongoing debates among proponents of each theory by identifying who, when, and why individuals decide to system-justify. We used data comprised of 24,009 participants nested within 42 countries. Multilevel models largely supported the competing claims of Social Dominance and Social Identity Theories over SJT. The most robust findings were: (1) greater objective SES was associated with greater system justification; (2) the consistent positive relationship between subjective SES and system justification was partially mediated by life satisfaction; and (3) both ends of the political spectrum were w
0
Profile banner
MM
mat marques, ph.d.
@fabiovelo.bsky.social
bicycles, coffee, and social psychology. he/him. woiworung land. mdmarques.com
84 followers105 following122 posts
HomePopularExplore