And yet millions of views across socials likely. We're cooked. 🫠
Misleading figures: Figure 5 doesn’t even address the hypothesis; Figure 8 uses sperm cell still images, which is ineffective for measuring motility. Lack of ethics approval: The study involves clinical samples (blood and semen??) but has no mention of ethics approval, a huge red flag.
Inappropriate controls: Flu vaccine used as a control doesn’t match the experimental conditions; a valid control needs to mirror everything except the variable being tested. No positive controls: The study lacks essential positive controls to validate its claims.
Subjective language: The abstract uses politically charged wording, e.g., "injectables pressed upon billions," which breaks scientific objectivity. No legitimate figures: No actual microscope images provided—only hand-drawn illustrations, which is highly unprofessional for a scientific paper.
Lead author Daniel Broudy, PhD, is a Professor of Applied Linguistics at Okinawa Christian University, not a molecular biologist. One of the co-authors is a gynecologist. I suspect this paper is more about studying the dissemination of propaganda or cognitive bias reinforcement on social media.
What’s a view gate?
No they’re streamed, anything that’s on torrents (including subtitles) is available in an interface like plex with a calendar to remind you of new shows. Set your requirements and watch no maintenence. www.reddit.com/r/StremioAdd...
Why rely on just one? openvibe.social is proprietary but I guess it doesn't matter too much since you control each connected account.
Interact With Anyone On The Open Internet. All Decentralised Social Networks, Single Timeline.
Set up Stremio and delete them all.
