BLUE
HP
Haroon Popal
@hpopal-brain.bsky.social
Post-Doctoral Associate | NIH F99/K00 D-SPAN scholar | Interested in social cognition and the cerebellum
93 followers135 following7 posts
Reposted by Haroon Popal
Smehr.nz

this is pretty amazing: @lucinauddin.bsky.socialwww.lieffcabraser.com/antitrust/ac... summary of the case:

The Publisher Defendants’ Scheme has three primary components. First, the Publisher Defendants agreed to not compensate scholars for their labor, in particular not to pay for their peer review services (the “Unpaid Peer Review Rule”). In other words, the Publisher Defendants agreed to fix the price of peer review services at zero. The Publisher Defendants also agreed to coerce scholars into providing their labor for nothing by expressly linking their unpaid labor with their ability to get their manuscripts published in the Publisher Defendants’ journals. In the “publish or perish” world of academia, the Publisher Defendants essentially agreed to hold the careers of scholars hostage so that the Publisher Defendants could force them to provide their valuable labor for free.
Second, the Publisher Defendants agreed not to compete with each other for manuscripts by requiring scholars to submit their manuscripts to only one journal at a time (the “Single Submission Rule”). The Single Submission Rule substantially reduces competition among the Publisher Defendants, substantially decreasing incentives to review manuscripts promptly and publish meritorious research quickly. The Single Submission Rule also robs scholars of negotiating leverage they otherwise would have had if more than one journal offered to publish their manuscripts. Thus, the Publisher Defendants know that if they offer to publish a manuscript, the submitting scholar has no viable alternative and the Publisher Defendant can then dictate the terms of publication.
Third, the Publisher Defendants agreed to prohibit scholars from freely sharing the scientific advancements described in submitted manuscripts while those manuscripts are under peer review, a process that often takes over a year (the “Gag Rule”). From the moment scholars submit manuscripts for publication, the Publisher Defendants behave as though the scientific advancements set forth in the manuscripts are their property, to be shared only if the Publisher Defendants grant permission. Moreover, when the Publisher Defendants select manuscripts for publication, the Publisher Defendants will often require scholars to sign away all intellectual property rights, in exchange for nothing. The manuscripts then become the actual property of the Publisher Defendants, and the Publisher Defendants charge the maximum the market will bear for access to that scientific knowledge.
11
Reposted by Haroon Popal
CCcatcamacho.bsky.social

I'm officially hiring full-time research assistants for my *NEW* lab to work on NIH-funded studies! We study emotions, neurodevelopment, and depression/anxiety. Perfect opportunity for post-bacc researchers planning to apply to MD or PhD programs. More info here: docs.google.com/document/d/1...

CRAB_RA_posting
CRAB_RA_posting

Hi Everyone, The Computational, Relational, and Affective Brain (CRAB) Lab at Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine is hiring two full time research assistants (Professional Rater I) ...

0
HPhpopal-brain.bsky.social

Guess it’s time to finally abandon the other app. No idea what rule I broke. I don’t use the account much. Last two things I did was retweet a video of the DC protest against Netanyahu yesterday and report a tweet that called all “Islamists” terrorist. 🤷‍♂️

0
Reposted by Haroon Popal
BMwj-mitchell.bsky.social

I shared all of my NIH F99/K00 (DSPAN) grant materials in a GitHub repo (github.com/wj-mitchell/...) a while ago for new applicants. I didn't see any examples of Research Performance Progress Reports (RPPRs) online so today I updated the repo with information and materials from mine.

GitHub - wj-mitchell/DSPAN_Details: Information and Materials Related to My NIH DSPAN F99/K00 Award
GitHub - wj-mitchell/DSPAN_Details: Information and Materials Related to My NIH DSPAN F99/K00 Award

Information and Materials Related to My NIH DSPAN F99/K00 Award - wj-mitchell/DSPAN_Details

0
Reposted by Haroon Popal
KJkjobson.bsky.social

🌟 Join us for our first summer coding workshop presented by Camille Johnston on 7/10 at 1pm! Learn predictive modeling with text data using R, covering data visualization, model evaluation, and result interpretation. Don't miss out! 📊 #DataScience#CodingWorkshop

1
Reposted by Haroon Popal
BMwj-mitchell.bsky.social

The Coding Outreach Group at Temple University is hosting our 5th annual summer workshop series! Join us online via Zoom on Wednesdays at 1 p.m. starting July 10th for advanced coding topics like text analysis and geospatial analysis in R. Open to all! #CodingWorkshop#TUCOG

2
Reposted by Haroon Popal
SMs-michelmann.bsky.social

Please retweet! I am excited to share that I am looking for motivated postdocs who want to come and work with me at NYU (please apply here: apply.interfolio.com/145544) (1/3)

2
Reposted by Haroon Popal
AHscattercushion.bsky.social

🧪Thank you to everyone who reached out. I had less than 24 hours to turn this one around, so I wasn't able to get in touch with everyone, but I finally feel like I'm starting to rebuild my old community of friendly science folks from the bad place.

0
Reposted by Haroon Popal
JKjenikubota.bsky.social

📢The SANS EDIJ Committee has put together a navigating SANS event for first-time attendees! Join hosts @hpopal-brain.bsky.social@catcamacho.bsky.social@sansmeeting.bsky.social

0
HP
Haroon Popal
@hpopal-brain.bsky.social
Post-Doctoral Associate | NIH F99/K00 D-SPAN scholar | Interested in social cognition and the cerebellum
93 followers135 following7 posts