BLUE
TS
The spook who sat by the doorbell camera
@hypervisible.bsky.social
Every future imagined by a tech company is worse than the previous iteration…or something like that.
7.2k followers617 following5.4k posts

HEcicadaqueen.bsky.social

I had to stop reading after the second paragraph. No words.

1
TShypervisible.bsky.social

Based on how people choose to interpret Section 230 and the 2nd amendment, basically all things are allowed.

Meanwhile, Han took a familiar argument about censorship in the online age and stretched it to its logical extreme. “I’m American,” he told me. “I believe in freedom of speech. I believe America is different. And we believe that, hey, AI should not be trained with censorship.” He went on: “In America, we can buy a gun. And this gun can be used to protect life, your family, people that you love—or it can be used for mass shooting.”
Federal law prohibits computer-generated images of child pornography when such images feature real children. In 2002, the Supreme Court ruled that a total ban on computer-generated child pornography violated the First Amendment. How exactly existing law will apply to generative AI is an area of active debate. When I asked Han about federal laws regarding CSAM, Han said that Muah.AI only provides the AI processing, and compared his service to Google. He also reiterated that his company’s word filter could be blocking some images, though he is not sure.
2
TS
The spook who sat by the doorbell camera
@hypervisible.bsky.social
Every future imagined by a tech company is worse than the previous iteration…or something like that.
7.2k followers617 following5.4k posts