S
Sherm
@iamthesherm.bsky.social
Cis Lunar. History, Engineering, Politics. BSEE, Iowa State University.
2 followers24 following82 posts
The defense retained an expert that has been going public claiming the conviction is unsafe and lamenting that he was never called to testify. The defense also had an expert testify at her application for appeal that denounced the prosecution experts theories on air embolism.
It's not because it is bad for their case, it is because her lawyer overestimated the effectiveness of his own cross examination. The jury never heard a medical expert challenge the prosecution's theories.
S
Sherm
@iamthesherm.bsky.social
Cis Lunar. History, Engineering, Politics. BSEE, Iowa State University.
2 followers24 following82 posts