Is research from 2016 old now? I don't care for that...

Strong agree. This is an exercise I use with my students a lot (what evidence would you need to conclude that you're wrong?). Helps them (and me) distinguish when they haven't thought much about something very much. A useful journalistic approach for dealing with elites, I suspect.

In recent work (preprint here: osf.io/s7nv4) I try to make some empirical progress on whether "ordinary readers" come away from typical news coverage with the critical info, and find that they generally do not.

We did a full service move when we came to VA. Had an awesome experience. UVa had a contract with a particular moving company, so we used their preferred mover who gave us great service because we were UVa's folks. Check to see if where you're moving has a preferred company.

From G search to FB to Expedia, the model appears to be: create useful tech, establish market dominance, replace with advertisements for crypto, degrade initial functionality, fire engineers, allocate remaining assets to Coachella brunchlords

The best use of LLMs I've heard yet.

How else am I supposed to know what economists are currently fighting about and political scientists will be fighting about in 3 years?

Proud of you Adam!