BLUE
Profile banner
BB
Beetlejosh Beetlejosh
@joshuajfriedman.com
Freelance writer and editor. Formerly of The Atlantic, Boston Review. Copy chief at Columbia Magazine.
42.8k followers2.4k following38.9k posts
BBjoshuajfriedman.com

Earlier bon mots via Scott MacFarlane, CBS: Trump atty Lauro: Justice Thomas directed us to raise this issue (of validity of Smith's appointment) Judge Chutkan interjects: "He *directed* you to do it?" Defense: Well ... he didn't *direct* us to

31

TTelandobbs.bsky.social

The brains of all these RW lawyers have been thoroughly cooked. Was a time John would not have said such a thing.

0
Bbkindetroit.bsky.social

We really don't have a defense so we're letting a justice of the supreme Court guide us

0
BEbruceediger.bsky.social

Nobody ever again gets to dismissively say "oh, they got off on a technicality".

1
SSshoutingboy.bsky.social

“Strictly speaking it was his wife that directed us, but she says he agrees”

0
Uunhipcat.bsky.social

‘He didn’t direct us like ‘direct’ us.’

0
JPcalmthoughts.bsky.social

Lauro said WAY TOO MUCH ! 🤯

0
JPcalmthoughts.bsky.social

Yeah “ Directed them to “. Great ! The Republican Enablers in the “”Supreme Court””. All six of their SORRY ASSES !

0
BBjoshuajfriedman.com

Judge Chutkan now brings up the Fischer ruling, which narrowed "corrupt obstruction of an official proceeding." Lauro wants to file entirely new motion. Chutkan: I'm inclined to vacate my denial of motion to dismiss on statutory grounds and to simply seek supplemental briefing (via Roger Parloff)

3
SKseankozma.bsky.social

What the fucking fuck?????

0
Profile banner
BB
Beetlejosh Beetlejosh
@joshuajfriedman.com
Freelance writer and editor. Formerly of The Atlantic, Boston Review. Copy chief at Columbia Magazine.
42.8k followers2.4k following38.9k posts