I think there's probably a better way even for regulating bad stuff than to use the system we have. I don't love the idea of special courts because I think that it being up to courts at all is a big part of the problem. I see where you're coming from though.

I think there's also a difference of tactics vs goals at play here. Would we see overall better outcomes by exempting good stuff? Probably but I think that coalition is a harder to build in Congress than a broader speed-up/recalibrating the whole environmental review process. But I'm just some guy.