Weird request, but that's what I'm good at. I'm looking for volunteers to tell me some of the things they like to do, and then I'll feed that list into an AI and tell you what you value. Trying to see how accurate this is. Thanks in advance!

It also turns out that the recording of a given transaction becomes more valuable than the transaction itself, which has some odd implications in terms of what's possible.

In a nutshell, it states that money is only a subset of the human value created, and we have to take into consideration all humans, because our actions generate data now. And data is extremely valuable, because it can be observed outside of the flow of time, i.e. recorded and replayed.

I agree, it needs to change. The biggest problem with traditional models of economics is that they don't take the internet into account. That changed the the way we communicate. I've got a Quantum Economic model I'm working on that offers guidance on building info-centric economies.

Heading out to SF to evangelize Quantum Economics and share how these models will help us create abundant human-aligned AI systems. Who should I make an effort to chat with while I'm out there?

Just thought of this as a potential book title. Thoughts? "Engineering Generosity: How to Build Human-centric Systems"

Money is only interesting when it's moving.

First-time founder: focus on raising money Second-time founder: focus on the product Third-time founder: focus on the people

Templated outputs eventually collapse to the template over time. The structure becomes more valuable than the information contained within.

Any degenerate gamblers interested in helping me with an experiment? I want to pit AI gamblers against you in a John Henry vs the machine sort of thing.