That is awesome
I will be a broken record on this: these are points to explicitly note on your respective department websites!!!! Very useful to know who DOES want contact and who DOES NOT.
Yes, of course, and itās good for them to know that. But Iām thinking more of people who are NOT accepting students, for a variety of reasons. Itās very hard to tell sometimes.
Just checked the Princeton history website and it is not helpful. You could even say: please do not email profs. But then you should tell them what they need to know before they put in the time and $$$ to apply.
SLAC prof here: more transparency on department and individual websites would be extremely handy. E.g. no one wants to pay the application fee if Prof X is retiring/leaving ā say whoās accepting students & how many per field. Share what you want people to know about you as advisor on your website.
I am so here for all the Nibi content. A diva beaver? who is so cute? and thinks sheās a person and just wants to stay with her human friends and eat fruit salad? Yes yes more please.
Nobody ever asks āhow can the Germans have just have stood by whilst it happenedā any more - which was something you commonly heard before - cause itās just abundantly clear now. The building of consent for fascist government is inbuilt in societies who see it as a reasonable option.
at this point i think āharris needs more detailsā is just the way, refracted through consumption of punditry, that these voters are saying that a) they donāt pay much attention and b) they donāt want to vote for a woman www.nytimes.com/2024/09/28/u...
Our IHR Seminar Europe and the World, 1500-1800 starts October 7 with Colin Jones and then continues with a feast of early modernists: Toby Green, Lila O'Leary Chambers, Erin Maglaque, Ana Struillou, Sheilagh Ogilvie, Allison Stielau, Michael Aidan Pope and more...
Everything they do to Black people they will do to you too. Just remember that as a rule and there will be less confusion about why overturning affirmative action hurts Asians and voter ID laws hurt white women
āRoughly 90 percent of women who marry adopt their husbandās last name. Roughly 90 percent of married female voters have different name on their ID than on their birth certificate. 34 percent of women could be turned away from polls unless they have precisely the right documents.ā FUCK THESE FUCKS.
Most women vote Democratic. And most still change their name when they marry. And thatās where the GOP sees an Achillesā heel.