To justify legalizing bump stocks, Clarence Thomas literally copied and pasted materials from an extremist pro-gun group whose violent rhetoric makes the NRA look moderate. This is who has the Supreme Court's ear these days. slate.com/news-and-pol...
I donāt think thatās anything you could imagine happening even 10 years ago.
We aren't gonna make it
I read the other day that he went into great detail. Schematics in his opinion. Iām thinking where did he get all that?. Just for fun asked myself. Iām always correct. Common sense would dictate a complete ban. Yea, complete.
>Bump stocks can effectively turn a rifle into a "machinegun" >Binary triggers can already do that with a higher RPM and were never banned >Law-abiding citizens dont magically turn evil when acquiring a high-RPM firearm >We should repeal the NFA
Wait, I thought conservatives were *against* plagiarism???
They probably bought him a boat.
If anyone wonders why the SCOTUS is utterly corrupt and should not be listened to or given any kind of respect, this is why.
Don't debate with gun fetishists. They will drag you down into petty details of nomenclature, implying a tacit acceptance that there's a possible justification through a 'legal' context where mass murder is simply an inconvenience we must all just put up with for the sake of 'freedom.'
Clarence didnāt copy the text, his Hitlerjugend Battalion Clerk did it. The moron justice canāt be bothered with writing his own nonsense any more.
What a shame it would be if some American psycho used a bump stock on Clarence.
