BLUE
Profile banner
PT
Peter Thal Larsen
@petertl.bsky.social
Global Editor, Reuters Breakingviews. Usual disclaimers apply. www.breakingviews.com
1.4k followers337 following540 posts
PTpetertl.bsky.social

sure, but REA is offering them a bigger share of the combined group than implied by pre-bid prices. That's effectively a premium.sure, but REA is offering them a bigger share of the combined group than implied by pre-bid prices. That's effectively a premium.

3

XMxvrmdf.bsky.social

You're completely looking at this from the wrong perspective. Because the consideration is not cash, it's a merger, not an acquisition, and because REA is valued at 2x the multiple of Rightmove, Rightmove shareholders would be massively diluted by this deal going through.

1
XMxvrmdf.bsky.social

That's the wrong yardstick. REA trades at 28x EV/EBITDA. Why do I, a Rightmove shareholder, want to dilute my Rightmove stake (15x EV/EBITDA, pre-bid) so I can buy REA stock at such an inflated valuation?

0
Bbrokenbanker.bsky.social

right, but REA is controlled by the majority shareholder with 61.42% of the equity, which deserves something of a discount in my mind, given who that majority shareholder is ?

1
Profile banner
PT
Peter Thal Larsen
@petertl.bsky.social
Global Editor, Reuters Breakingviews. Usual disclaimers apply. www.breakingviews.com
1.4k followers337 following540 posts