i argued that it wasn't clearly antisemetic. it isn't clear unless you know nazi rhetoric. again, people should not have to know everything every nazi ever said in order to oppose Israel murdering people. it's an impossible standard.

am i being obtuse for failing to see what Kennedy gained from this lie?

cheap dopamine hits, but not so cheap that you weren't emotionally invested.

i have never spoken or written the phrase at issue here. not sure how objecting to analysis paralysis is doubling down.

*dived

the nazis and their apologists use false victim narratives. unfortunately, there are (at least) tens of thousands of actual victims of the state of Israel now. I'd rather that Israel had not doced head first into the genocide business, but here we are.

i thank that's fine. what i don't think is fine is requiring people to know everything every nazi ever said in order to castigate Israel for murdering a pile of people.

if you don't know it was already coined... like Newton and Liebnitz both invented the calculus

or else not be paralyzed from action for fear of accidentally coining a term some nazi also made decades ago.

given that it could have derived directly from what Palestinians call Israel, "the zionist entity", i think that it is unimportant where it came from. unless we're now calling Palestinians nazis