Weird how he got the proportions of the human head so right, and yet those of the cat so wrong. I’ve noticed that in a lot of painters from that period; also with regard to babies (Mary with child etc). Even the greats, Michelangelo, da Vinci.. would get kids & animals more wrong than adult humans.
It’s a well-known professional ailment. No cure
Is formal semantics still a thing? I thought we had sort of given it up in the peak Wittgenstein years.
Is formal semantics still a thing? I thought we had sort of given it up in the peak Wittgenstein years.
Visible in southern hemisphere?
there’s something quintessentially british about this picture idk. like, you’d find these lads in every british pub.
I wouldn’t be too surprised if 25th-century historians would use ability-to-build-efficient-highspeed-rail-networks as a key benchmark for civilisational progress in the late 20th/21st centuries.
“Affects” is typical statistician speak dodging the causality issue. While news source affects views, views will also affect choice of media. The chicken-and-egg question is not addressed. Views will also be affected by other factors.
too close for comfort...