Are there important social epistemologists who are *not* epistemic relativists of some sort? Can you do global epistemologies, Epistemol. of the South, IKS, etc. from an objectivist perspective. (S. Fuller says I should use “universalist”, I refuse). Most seem to subscribe to ill-defined “pluralism”

I work with scientific pluralism as an M.A. student. I hope it won't be too much diversion from your question. Recently, l also had to think about definitions and classifications of scientific pluralism. There are as many of them as the people who work on the subject. I provisionally, decided that +