This is a valuable paper. I do wonder about the generalisability of findings from Plos, though. In my experience, less prestigious generalist journals like Plos tend not to have the highest quality peer review. Perhaps things look better at journals with stronger community endorsement?

I think I was pretty clear in the paper that we don't know how well the findings will generalize. I also address the criticism about PLOS review quality: I went through all the reviews myself, and they look no different from what you would see elsewhere (just my sense though, no data on that).