BLUE
Profile banner
SB
Stephen Bush
@stephenkb.bsky.social
Associate editor and columnist @financialtimes.com. Post too often about culture, public policy, management, politics, nerd stuff. Tongue usually in cheek. Try my UK politics newsletter for free here: www.ft.com/tryinsidepolitics
18.9k followers1.8k following21.1k posts
SBstephenkb.bsky.social

No, sorry, the average person who works in HR or compliance does not think this, and believing that they do marks you out as someone liable to start barking at cars.

A key part of progressive politics is hostility to the nation state. The bureaucratic class dislikes the
nation state for two strong reasons. Firstly, as it presents an alternative mechanism of power. Through
democratic elections within a nation state, and political power, the bureaucratic class can have its
powers reduced.
10

TPtomph.bsky.social

Dunno if I'm reading too much coherence into this drivel, but that's an uhhh interesting distinction they're drawing between the governmental state (the bureaucratic class loves it, it is their source of power and purpose) and the nation state (the bureaucratic class hates this one weird trick)

0
SBstephenkb.bsky.social

To repeat myself: the average person who works in HR, or compliance, indeed the average person *on the left*, let alone the great mass of working age people who did not vote Conservative in 2024, does not agree with this, and believing they do identifies you as someone who badly needs to touch grass

The problem for the left, to quote a key 2012 decolonisation essay, is they think that for ethnic
minorities, “the attainment of equal legal and cultural entitlements, is actually an investment in settler
colonialism”. In other words, successful integration of ethnic minorities in Western societies merely
props up the unjust social structures within society.
The goal of the progressive ideology is to replace the nation state with a new multicultural society
managed by the bureaucratic class itself. In reality, this will merely replicate post-colonial states with
weak national identities. The progressive discomfort of not judging migrants for the benefits they bring
means we simply allow too many people for our society or economy to be able to cope with
5
PPppudney.bsky.social

Imagining any of the HR people I know thinking deeply about the nation state is a real stretch. Thinking they do their job with this in mind, is well out there 🤔

0
ABalanbeattie.bsky.social

I don’t get what this is in contradistinction to. Being a vizier for a sultan? The mandarinate in imperial China? Or is it just the EU again?

0
Aandymb.bsky.social

100% ideologue for an imaginary nation

0
SLluke-minded.bsky.social

It's so odd. HR & compliance people are there to protect the company & its interests. They don't give a shit about political power if they're good at their jobs. Sales & strategy people try hard to understand politics but often have to divorce themselves from it or they have compromised strategies

0
WCwillcooling.bsky.social

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

0
NBnickbwalking.bsky.social

"I'm sorry, but there's no treatment that will work for your child now. They're terminally online, full Badenoch."

0
AEalunephraim.bsky.social

I have terrible news as to the exact relationship between bureaucracy and the nation state.

0
IRtheangelremiel.bsky.social

95% of the time when someone invents a group to write about them and calls them "the ____ class" they basically mean about four people they dislike.95% of the time when someone invents a group to write about them and calls them "the ____ class" they basically mean about four people they dislike.

1
Profile banner
SB
Stephen Bush
@stephenkb.bsky.social
Associate editor and columnist @financialtimes.com. Post too often about culture, public policy, management, politics, nerd stuff. Tongue usually in cheek. Try my UK politics newsletter for free here: www.ft.com/tryinsidepolitics
18.9k followers1.8k following21.1k posts