So will the NYT cover Jack Smith's unsealed evidence as much as it covered Hillary's emails in 2016?

The guy who told 30,000 documented lies in 4 years and lies the same way that most people breathe is put on the same playing field and made equivalent to an average (and very successful) politician.

History professors -- if you still assign essays based on primary sources with digital submissions, are you encountering a lot of AI-generated content? How are you handling it? A prof said s/he was requiring annotated notes of primary sources. I'd like to know more.

If you would like to see how I arrived at these conclusions, I'd invite you to examine these: Part 1: threadreaderapp.com/thread/18235...threadreaderapp.com/thread/18236...threadreaderapp.com/thread/18243...threadreaderapp.com/thread/18251...

We have problems but the economy is objectively above average. The reasons for Trump's lead are: incessant branding, media framing, voters' inability to consider multiple macroeconomic indicators beyond inflation, and the unwillingness of many Dems to recognize positive economic statistics.

Trump has consistently maintained a 10+ point lead on the economy. If he wins, the economy will be a major factor. There is almost no factual basis for Trump to have this lead. I spent 2-3 weeks combing through the data. I then rated the economy as objectively as I could at 6.5 out of 10.

Do you feel like mainstream media is failing miserably at explaining the stakes in this election and holding the candidates to the same standards? There are two articles that help to explain why. Julie Hotard: upine.medium.com/why-mainstre...newrepublic.com/article/1849...

Nice job on the analysis and in your interview with Greg Sargent.

Is anyone volunteering for the #Harris#harriswalz2024 campaign? If so, what specific organization are you working with?

I mean, your whole adult life, right? 😆