excited to share ongoing results from the TRGB-SBF Project, where we aim to resolve the Hubble tension with a distance ladder which is independent of the usual Cepheid+Type Ia supernova route! 🔭🧪 arxiv.org/abs/2408.16810

excited to share ongoing results from the TRGB-SBF Project, where we aim to resolve the Hubble tension with a distance ladder which is independent of the usual Cepheid+Type Ia supernova route! 🔭🧪 arxiv.org/abs/2408.16810

hey everyone, if you're interested in the Hubble Tension, *please* see this paper we just put out. 🔭 🧪 arxiv.org/abs/2408.11770

hey everyone, if you're interested in the Hubble Tension, *please* see this paper we just put out. 🔭 🧪 arxiv.org/abs/2408.11770

for those interested in the Hubble tension and the new paper from the CCHP... here is an important thread copied over from Dan Scolnic on twitter. TLDR; the Hubble tension is alive and well. JWST and HST distance scales are in phenomenal agreement. new paper from SH0ES team with details soon. 🔭🧪

for those interested in the Hubble tension and the new paper from the CCHP... here is an important thread copied over from Dan Scolnic on twitter. TLDR; the Hubble tension is alive and well. JWST and HST distance scales are in phenomenal agreement. new paper from SH0ES team with details soon. 🔭🧪

hey all, please check out new paper led by JHU grad student Sean Li on JWST and the distance scale! in short, the JWST TRGB and HST (and JWST) Cepheid distance scales are in near-perfect agreement, and the Hubble tension absolutely persists. arxiv.org/abs/2408.00065 🔭🧪

hey all, please check out new paper led by JHU grad student Sean Li on JWST and the distance scale! in short, the JWST TRGB and HST (and JWST) Cepheid distance scales are in near-perfect agreement, and the Hubble tension absolutely persists. arxiv.org/abs/2408.00065 🔭🧪

“At the same time, the Chandra X-Ray Center and Space Telescope Science Institute, […], are planning for layoffs to reduce costs in line with NASA’s budget profile, moves that could involve dozens of people and which could take effect as soon as September.” 🥲 🔭🧪 spacenews.com/review-concl...

Review concludes proposed NASA budget cuts would end Chandra

A NASA committee concluded there is no way to continue operating the Chandra X-ray Observatory with NASA’s proposed budget cuts in 2025.

“At the same time, the Chandra X-Ray Center and Space Telescope Science Institute, […], are planning for layoffs to reduce costs in line with NASA’s budget profile, moves that could involve dozens of people and which could take effect as soon as September.” 🥲 🔭🧪 spacenews.com/review-concl...

Review concludes proposed NASA budget cuts would end Chandra

A NASA committee concluded there is no way to continue operating the Chandra X-ray Observatory with NASA’s proposed budget cuts in 2025.