Thanks. According to that article, Tegnell says he did so thinking that guy was referring to a published article, which turned out not to be the case. Sloppy.

That would be called sloppy if he was someone who wasn't a state epidemiologist. As a state epidemiologist, that was unprofessional. Why didn't he check and read said study and then send that study in emails instead of a YouTube video of a guy who was known to give diet advice? He seemed clueless.