Last year, while out with a large group, one got crying drunk. Right before the actual tears they let their MAGA flag fly. That was surprising (for this group). When I asked why they said it was because Trump did not and will not start wars. This has been one of their talking points for a few years.

People try to overinterpret everything he does as 4D chess, whether for good (his fans) or for evil (his foes). It's much simpler. If he's saying or doing something stupid, it's because *he actually believes that stupid thing*. He's not some 4d-chess-playing genius pulling the strings of the world

Yes. "The future existence of your rapist's child outweighs your rights to control your own body" is not the subtext of what Vance is saying, that is *explicitly* what Vance is saying, it is the argument he is choosing to make his point. bsky.app/profile/heid...

For most Americans SCOTUS’ opinions are just headlines. Staying silent except to speak through something that a majority of Americans don’t read or understand serves to further erode the court’s credibility

As much as I understand that the 3 non-corrupt believe they must protect the institution, at what point does their silence become complicity in the destruction of that same institution. They know how terrible their “colleagues” are

Without going on his site you can see his posts here: trumpstruth.org

Trump's Truth

'Trump's Truth' is a searchable archive of Donald Trump's posts on TRUTH Social.

And because climate change is a hoax, he only has to plan for now. No need to consider natural disasters. Just drill baby drill. Seriously-these guys are delusional and extremely dangerous

“To encourage would be parents to get on with procreation” combined with these plans doesn’t at all remind me of Handmaid’s tale. Creepy AF

'Trump suggested that ***he would fight to remain in power regardless of whether he had won the election***. Specifically Trump told [] "It doesn't matter if you won or lost the election. You still have to fight like hell."'

You don’t need to debate phrenologists, flat earthers, race scientists, 9/11 truthers, climate change deniers, or January 6 insurrectionists. Their ideas have been examined and been found lacking. They lost the debate. Pointing that out, and then ignoring them, is not censorship.