BLUE
CMroxconn.bsky.social

It’s like one day they realized “Oh, wait, we can still keep him out for being a pedophile, so we’re not actually hypocrites” and then went full steam ahead

0
FJsorocchungus.bsky.social

Pedophile shit

0
HCsarducci.bsky.social

Again you’re making this shit up. I don’t care. You tried and failed to portray me as a pedophile and you tried and failed to claim I’m behind an entirely different profile. Desperate clown ass

2
CFcampster.bsky.social

You’ll have like five paragraphs of “Jack Dorsey was having a real hard time reconciling his free speech absolutism with the violent realities of January 6th” and then a “Meanwhile Musk was in a legal battle about calling a dude a pedophile on that very platform”

1
timrod12.bsky.social

I can. I can also see that using that as a basis for any argument validates the argument, even if it’s something that everyone agrees is despicable and completely wrong. Like in the pedophile illustration stated above. “Mind your business” isn’t a solution. It’s an allowance for ANYTHING 2 continue

0
Ltoolate.bsky.social

She started dating a man who's in prison for murdering a pedophile and you think she'll fall in love with you because you liked the ig story of her throwing leaves into a pond ?! 😭😂💀💔🔥💯

0
MFdgirl.bsky.social

Dems think they can shame the left into voting for them. Problem is, you need to have some moral standing for that to work. It's about as effective as a pedophile trying to make you go vegan

0
timrod12.bsky.social

If you’re not a pedophile, don’t sleep with kids, but don’t tell others not to cos it’s none of your business. See now why your basis/argument doesn’t hold much water?

1
CHstxopher.bsky.social

A while back, I read the documentation around the "Breendoggle" when the Berkeley SF community was arguing over whether Walter Breen, a known pedophile, should be included in activities. (Also, MZB's husband) The issues and rhetoric are hauntingly similar to what we heard during Gamergate.....

2