BLUE
JItheboobtaster.bsky.social

in which situation would you need to describe “tgirl dick” in a scientific way and why would you use girl instead of woman while talking about penises.

1
Cc0nc0rdance.bsky.social

Stigler's Law of Eponymy states that no scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer. It was first proposed by sociologist Robert K. Merton, but statistician Stephen Stigler, in fulfillment of the law, named it after himself in 1980, tongue-in-cheek. You may know Robert Merton ...

A screenshot of a paper called "Stigler's Law of Eponymy" by Stephen Stigler, 1980.

Web link is here:
https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2164-0947.1980.tb02775.x
1
AMartom.bsky.social

For a new species for science, those who write the paper describing the species can give the scientific name. Not sure how giving the common English name would work on this situation.

0
Eesiode.bsky.social

📃Scientific paper: High-throughput droplet-based analysis of influenza A virus genetic reassortment by single-virus RNA sequencing ➡️ Continued on ES/IODE

0
AWnalexwhite.bsky.social

But the consensus can still be wrong, can’t it? The history of science is peppered with new ideas which don’t agree with the scientific consensus of the day but turn out on further investigation to be true. Plate Tectonics is less than a century old, and duelling palaeontologists around for ever!

0
Eesiode.bsky.social

📃Scientific paper: In Vivo and in Vitro activity of colistin-conjugated bimetallic silver-copper oxide nanoparticles against Pandrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa ➡️ Continued on ES/IODE

0
Iizanamic.bsky.social

As an #atheist#anti-theist I consider this scientific proof that there is no god or goddess, no nebulous thing or spirit. Just saying:

1
Eesiode.bsky.social

📃Scientific paper: On an optimal AFEM for elastoplasticity ➡️ Continued on ES/IODE

0
BEbritishecolsoc.bsky.social

Organised by Phil Martin, Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3) (Spain) and Matt Grainger, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (Norway)

Bold white heading says,'How to do awesome evidence synthesis'. White body text says, 'The increase in scientific literature means that evidence synthesis in ecology is crucial. However, it often lacks robustness. This workshop offers a whistle-stop tour of different types of evidence synthesis, how to carry out a systematic review, and useful tools, using a mix of lectures and practical sessions.'
1