God help me, I've started a new #xphi@xphilosopher.bsky.social. I think this means I've finally spiritually embraced positive xphi?
A reflection test question "lures" test takers to select *one* particular incorrect response — not just *any* incorrect response. So these three questions yielding fewer "intuitive" responses than *other* incorrect responses may not measure reflection: doi.org/10.1016/j.jb...#psychometrics#xPhi
How do we expect people to follow social norms? Philosophers argue about it from armchairs. Experimental philosophers study people, but usually in isolation. Dawn Wang's interactive experiments on South African students offers new insight, direction. hdl.handle.net/10468/14502#xPhi#Psychology
Another reflective thinking prime didn't work: In two experiments in multiple countries, a brief scientific article describing the benefits of intuitive or reflective thinking didn't impact performance on tests of intuitive and reflective thinking. doi.org/10.1111/sjop...#decisionScience#xPhi
Academics: how do your journal preferences compare to others? "Publish or Comparish" is an online game to find out (and contribute to research): publishcomparish.herokuapp.com?r=4bvQReYtjW...#science#academia#higherEd#publishing#psychology#dataScience#ethics#philosophyOfScience#xPhi
Moral comparisons of utilitarian tradeoffs depended on the rating protocol? 🤔 The (mean) relative difference in morality in one protocol was sometimes undetected in the other protocol! A few differences reversed between protocols! doi.org/10.1016/j.co...#SurveyMethods#xPhi#ethics#moralPsych