BLUE
Profile banner
DN
Darren Newman
@daznewman.bsky.social
Employment Law trainer, writer, consultant, anorak
615 followers869 following195 posts
DNdaznewman.bsky.social

We spent literally hundreds of pounds chasing the Northern lights across Norway and Iceland. Here they are about 50 yards from our house just outside Cambridge.

0
DNdaznewman.bsky.social

I think there’s room for different views- and eventually for litigation

1
DNdaznewman.bsky.social

You just want the Moon on a stick!

1
DNdaznewman.bsky.social

I agree in general. But I think the very dense provisions on ZHC hide the fact that all of the actual detail is left to Regulation. You can’t tell what the new right is based on the Bill alone.

1
DNdaznewman.bsky.social

I think the employers lobby would absolutely go to the mattresses over the state actually preventing them doing what they felt needed to be done rather than let the courts deal with it afterwards. I remember the row over the initial directive on information and consultation. It’s a red line for them

1
DNdaznewman.bsky.social

Had another go at reading the Employment Rights Bill on Guaranteed Hours. It’s a slog but partly because all of the bits that light help you understand what it actually means are left to later Regulations.

1
DNdaznewman.bsky.social

Well if they meet the 20 person threshold it will probably count as a collective redundancy so there is a requirement to consult there

1
DNdaznewman.bsky.social

I don’t think that is much scope really. The exception strikes me as narrow. And note in the Next Steps document that the government will consider introducing interim relief.

1
DNdaznewman.bsky.social

Right. Going to have another try at the ‘Right to Guaranteed Hours’ now.

1
Profile banner
DN
Darren Newman
@daznewman.bsky.social
Employment Law trainer, writer, consultant, anorak
615 followers869 following195 posts