This is the fundamental paradox of AI: if it's actually helping you, there is no way to know when it is no longer helping you. Put another way: if you can supervise it effectively enough to catch its mistakes, you probably didn't need it in the first place.
Is it ethical? No. But does it produce reliable results? Also no. Ahh! But does it make an obscene profit? Again, absolutely not.
Friends, I can promise you zero return on your investment, which is $5B better than these clowns. www.cnbc.com/2024/09/27/o...
CNBC has confirmed that OpenAI expects about $5 billion in losses on $3.7 billion in revenue this year — figures first reported by The New York Times.
Handily the best newspaper column of the week on this election. Uses the power of irony so well that it even challenges the sanewashing of Trump. www.usatoday.com/story/opinio...
Comrade Kamala Harris gave an economic speech Wednesday, and it was light on the two things I demand: Rambling stories and rabid xenophobia.
Hidetaka Miyazaki had it right when he made Bloodborne. He understood at a primal level that there is nothing scarier than waking up and realizing you’re in England
a bold and controversial stance, I know
elevator pitch is that "AI" isn't replacing jobs; instead, companies are investing hard in an overhyped tech and we are headed towards a dotcom-style crash
