This insightful video by the VFX experts at Corridor Digital shows how fake, AI-generated scam videos are created and provides useful tips on how to tell whether a video you find online is likely an AI fake: www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsM7...
YouTube video by Corridor Crew
This insightful video by the VFX experts at Corridor Digital shows how fake, AI-generated scam videos are created and provides useful tips on how to tell whether a video you find online is likely an AI fake: www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsM7...
YouTube video by Corridor Crew
That’s just your opinion, man… but here’s mine! My new Substack is live: Speak Now Regret Later. Expect rants, science, and a few regrets. Check it out: www.speakandregret.michaelinzlicht.com#Substack#SpeakNowRegretLater
An unfiltered exploration of psychology, culture, and the world through the eyes of an impulsive yet remorseful professor. Click to read Speak Now Regret Later, by Michael Inzlicht, a Substack publica...
To understand why correlation does not necessarily mean causation, we should understand what correlation actually is, and what it means. This post can help you think more clearly about this important, and sometimes misunderstood concept: buff.ly/4ec9dim
You’ve probably heard that “correlation is not causation”, but what does that mean? It’s a phrase that captures the fact that, just because two things are correlated doesn’t mean that one causes the o...
Pop psychology on social media has reached peak stupidity. It feels like it’s poisoned a lot of peoples’ minds with a misunderstanding of many basic concepts.
I don't get it. What's the joke?
There are other reasons I felt the review was clownishly smooth-brained, but I find the attitude of "if you didn't find what you hypothesized you would, perhaps you should just drop it from the paper" to be particularly egregious, especially given psych's replication issues.
Just got a woefully incompetent review. In the paper, I hypothesized sig. corrs btwn X & 2 conceptually-related variables. Found sig. corr for 1, but didn't find it for the other so reviewer suggested I file drawer it; specifically, cut all mention of the variable b/c results were nonsignificant.
ALT: a man in a suit and tie is saying " you are part of the problem "
There’s a difference between vacuous, bloated corporate speech, and meaningless corporate bullshit. @metacognishane.bsky.socialbuff.ly/3WszPFC (I wish I’d had this 30 years earlier)
Statements are not "tasks." Can you give an example of a task for which the use of IQ is "stupidly destructive?"