Nicely explained đ
This goes worldwide. As of primary energy consumption, Biofuels should be for things that can't be practically run off of batteries with current technology, and for utilizing residual energy in solid wastes before utilizing it for fertilizer.
Yes, having biomass at unsustainable levels is still bad for the climate. Biomass is only a a good renewable fuel up to sustainable levels.  Honestly, other than waste products we shouldn't be using any biomass for our main energy grid.
âIt started on Oct 7th.â On 30 September 2000, during the 2nd Intifada, 12-year-old Muhammad al-Durrah was tragically killed in the Gaza Strip against the Zionist military occupation. He and his father, Jamal al-Durrah, sought shelter behind a concrete cylinder. IDF killed them. 24 years ago.
Now we Brits have rid ourselves of those pesky EU regulations, we're finally free to enjoy more of those delicious pesticides. From @dpcarrington.bsky.social
Exclusive: Unlike the EU, Great Britain has slashed protections for scores of food types
100% No mention of biomass (wood burning) either. It's a milestone but we still have millstones around the climates neck..
The ends cannot justify the means. This wasn't done for the climate. It was achieved through harsh crackdown on unions in South Wales and England. The UK is a prime example of an unjust transition. www.theguardian.com/business/202...
UKâs 142-year history of coal-fired electricity ends as turbines at Ratcliffe-on-Soar plant in Nottinghamshire stop for good
đ¨Breaking: Just seven out of 87 fossil fuel companies operating in the North Sea will invest anything in renewable energy by 2030, according to Uplift:
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
âExistential threatâ is a thin excuse: the out-of-control force that is pushing the Middle East to the brink is Israel itself, says Guardian columnist Nesrine Malik