The thing with medical transcription is there's always a review of the transition by the clinician who dictated it because they're responsible. So I can see how someone would think that it would be a place it fit. But clinicians are expensive and busy, so lots of errors are bad.

No; there is SUPPOSED to be a review by the clinician In reality-land it’s more that the clinician might glance at it for .5 seconds before signing off on it

I have a friend who works in medical software. One of the things they can do is see how long it takes a clinician to authorise each transcribed file. So we can confidently say, they do not check them

There is not always a review, or not a good one. I found tons of mistakes in my medical records due to transcription. Calling me “he” (back when I was still CLEARLY a woman), grammar mistakes, etc. Really obvious stuff.

But yeah, it's super dumb because if people think for 5 minutes about what an LLM is, of course it can't do this. And humans are bad at picking up errors on review so it's just dumb to assume human in the loop fixes the fundamental problem