BLUE
Profile banner
KH
Kathryn Harrison
@profkharrison.bsky.social
Climate policy researcher, UBC Professor, chemical engineer, political scientist, feminist, cyclist. Persistently hopeful, but losing patience!
185 followers102 following19 posts
KHprofkharrison.bsky.social

Help - I have many questions! - is the issue the regulatory limit on vapour pressure or actual pressure? - if actual why are light oils being blended in? - why would that reduce value of heavy crude? - how did US refiners not know quality of Cdn bitumen? www.theglobeandmail.com/business/ind...

U.S. oil refiners raise concerns about quality of crude shipped on Trans Mountain pipeline expansion
U.S. oil refiners raise concerns about quality of crude shipped on Trans Mountain pipeline expansion

Several West Coast refiners have raised concerns in recent weeks about the initial volumes’ high sulphur content, acidity and vapour pressure

0
KHprofkharrison.bsky.social

Carbon tax Q: the BC's budget has a table comparing net carbon tax bills for various household sizes/incomes across provinces. As I'd expect, it shows net benefits in AB, SK, MB, ON - but net costs, even for low inc families, in Atlantic provinces. Doesn't make sense to me. Insights welcome.

0
Reposted by Kathryn Harrison
SDsimondonner.bsky.social

Crime of the axe-the-tax campaign? It is distracting Canada from a real discussion about climate policy options. Misinformation is leading folks to argue to abandon a policy, without considering the costs of doing so. From @profkharrison.bsky.socialwww.nationalobserver.com/2024/04/05/o...

Deniers and doomers are leading the carbon tax opposition
Deniers and doomers are leading the carbon tax opposition

Calls to suspend the April 1 increase at best ignore the real causes of the affordability crisis, and at worst seek to win Canadians’ support via false solutions.

0
KHprofkharrison.bsky.social

Ontario yesterday repealed "Bill" 124 - a law passed by the leg and proclaimed by Lt Gov-- via order in council, rather than legislators repealing. That's because S 40 states "On the day this section comes into force, this Act is repealed." Is this common?! Have Courts ruled on this approach before?

0
KHprofkharrison.bsky.social

Just taught a 3-hour seminar and my students were all f'g brilliant. They had taught themselves everything I wanted them to learn (about what the oil/gas emissions cap reveals about cleavages in the Cdn federation). All I did was reiterate key points at the end. Sometimes I really love my job.

1
KHprofkharrison.bsky.social

Lots of applause for the oil and gas cap framework today. Yay in 2026 the fed govt will regulate a sector that's doubled its emissions since 1990! Praise for a govt backing off on a plan that was already falling short. I don't buy it's the Sup Ct. I'm discouraged because I fear it's us, Canadians.

0
Reposted by Kathryn Harrison
RWwaiterich.bsky.social

This Is Just To Say I have avoided the emissions that were in that uncut forest and which were probably not going to happen anyway Forgive me they have offset my own emissions so warming and so high

3
KHprofkharrison.bsky.social

Canadian climate policy folks -- I'm aware of the PBO's reports comparing federal carbon tax costs and rebates by quintile in different provinces. Can anyone point me to analysis of the variation of tax costs within quintiles?

2
KHprofkharrison.bsky.social

Climate nerd Groundhog Day is yet another request to explain how/whether carbon taxes work. 15 yrs and counting.

0
Reposted by Kathryn Harrison
MDdarrigomelanie.bsky.social

Mike Pence should be forced to carry his Presidential campaign to term.

77
Profile banner
KH
Kathryn Harrison
@profkharrison.bsky.social
Climate policy researcher, UBC Professor, chemical engineer, political scientist, feminist, cyclist. Persistently hopeful, but losing patience!
185 followers102 following19 posts