So, how is targeting a fire station in a non-combatant nation, centered in an area where they are running around putting out fires caused by rockets, consistent with attacking Hezbollah rocket sites? Genocidaire fellow-travellers, actually look at what at what is happening!
Israelis flock to ceremonies, cemeteries and memorial sites around the country as strikes on Lebanon capital continue
This. Anyone cheering the deaths of civilians, you monsters, read this. We can make this stop anytime. That we choose not too is so shameful I don't know where to begin. www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
Every year has been catastrophic for Palestinians around the world, but the past 12 months have been unimaginable, writes Guardian columnist Arwa Mahdawi
I think, as academics, we all have our Cato moments. He was all: Carthago delenda est. I'm all about: the enhanced permeability and retention effect is not a thing and is an artifact of rodent models. Stop using it. Both of us tried/are trying to change the world.
I recently expressed a desire to shift the culture in academic research to one that values scientists as much as the science they produce. This article does a really good job of that in the context of scientific fraud 🧪: www.thetransmitter.org/science-and-...
Basically, when your actions affect others, they can definitely be regulated. Where your actions affect only yourself, there is a much higher bar to be met for the government to regulate. Hence, no running around with guns here (that's nuts), but you can access assisted dying.
This provides consensus jurists to be appointed to the court. Experts in law. Our cases just never get as contentious as they do in the US. The Court drove same-sex marriage, and also a right-to-die. Canada values freedom FROM, rather than US freedom TO do whatever you want fuck the consequences.
Following these consultations, the MOJ presents recommendations to the Prime Minister who then chooses the appointment. Taken from: www.constitutionalstudies.ca/2019/06/supr...
The MOJ consults on this list with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, relevant provincial and territorial attorney generals as well as members of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, and the Standing Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs;
The Advisory Board reviews the applications, guided by the qualifications and assessment criteria provided by the Prime Minister; The Advisory Board provides the Prime Minister with non-binding, merit-based recommendations of three to five qualified candidates for consideration;